5 Filmmaking Tips From David Leitch

At its core, the three-act construction is screenwriting’s previous trustworthy: Act One units the stage, Act Two raises the stakes, and Act Three pays all of it off. Even the wildest, most “rule-breaking” tales often hold on to this framework.The genius of Pulp Fiction is that it doesn’t reject this mannequin—it hides it inside a puzzle of non-linear vignettes. And when you begin trying carefully, the items click on collectively, revealing an entire image that’s been there all alongside.So, let’s pull this puzzle aside piece by piece. As a result of when you see the way it matches, Pulp Fiction stops feeling chaotic—and begins displaying itself as a meticulously assembled narrative with three deliberate acts.The Three-Act Construction: A Fast RefresherHere’s the quick-and-dirty on the three-act construction: Act One is the setup. You meet your characters, get a really feel for the world, and hit a turning level that kicks all the things into movement.Act Two is the confrontation—the place stakes rise, plans go sideways, and your protagonists are examined. There’s typically a “midpoint” twist that flips issues round.Act Three is the decision. Whether or not it ends in victory, defeat, or one thing murky in between, the story finds closure.Why does this mannequin nonetheless matter in 2025?As a result of it really works. You’ll be able to bend it, scramble it, even gentle it on fireplace, however the human mind nonetheless loves tales with a starting, center, and finish—even when we’re not seeing them in that order. Most filmmakers (sure, even the bizarre ones) quietly use this construction as a basis.And Tarantino? Nicely, he additionally makes use of it—it’s simply he hides it in plain sight.Pulp Fiction’s Narrative TrickeryLet’s get one factor clear: non-linear storytelling doesn’t imply no-structure storytelling. Pulp Fiction could seem like a set of out-of-order quick movies, however if you happen to line all the things up chronologically, the traditional construction jumps proper out.Tarantino provides us vignettes—Vincent Vega’s misadventures, Butch’s escape, Jules’ disaster of religion—however these aren’t aimless. They’re intentionally crafted to serve bigger arcs. Vincent’s night time out with Mia, is greater than only a quirky filler—it builds pressure, units up penalties, and results in a climax (hey, overdose scene). You might suppose these items are simply floating and hovering. In fact, they’re connecting.And what’s wild is, despite the fact that the timeline jumps round, the emotional beats are positioned precisely the place they’d be in a standard three-act movie. You simply must zoom out to see it.Act 1: Hidden Setup—The Calm Earlier than the StormTarantino’s opening scenes could really feel unfastened, however they’re quietly laying the muse. We begin with “Vincent & Jules’ Divine Intervention”—the banter, Large Kahuna Burger, the Ezekiel 25:17, the taking pictures. All this goes past taste and units up character dynamics, the mysterious briefcase, and Jules’ inside battle, which turns into central later.Then we bounce to Butch (Bruce Willis), the washed-up boxer, being paid by Marsellus Wallace (Ving Rhames) to throw a battle. That scene? It’s pure setup. You meet Butch’s quiet resistance, Marsellus’ looming presence, and a battle ready to blow up.These early items don’t scream “Act One,” however they do precisely what an Act One ought to: introduce the gamers, the stakes, and the stress cooker they’re all sitting in.Tarantino’s simply swapping out conventional exposition for hitman small speak and breakfast violence. ‘Pulp Fiction’ Credit score: Miramax Movies Act 2: Confrontation—The Internet TightensNow the stress builds. Pulp Fiction’s Act Two is chaos in a swimsuit—and but, all the things escalates with precision.The midpoint shift is sly. It’s not a gunfight or an enormous reveal—it’s the diner. “Pumpkin” (Tim Roth) and “Honey Bunny” (Amanda Plummer) attempt to rob the place. It’s the identical scene we noticed firstly—however now, we return to it with new context. Jules (Samuel L. Jackson) is mid-philosophical awakening, and all of a sudden, this low-stakes theft turns into a high-stakes ethical take a look at.Elsewhere, Vincent (John Travolta) offers with Mia’s (Uma Thurman) overdose. Butch kills a man within the ring, betrays Marsellus, and goes on the run. Each character is colliding with penalties. Each thread tightens.The pacing would possibly really feel informal, however don’t be fooled. That is traditional Act Two materials—rising pressure, converging storylines, and characters pushed to their limits.Act 3: Decision—The Hidden PayoffsYou won’t spot it instantly, however Pulp Fiction’s third act delivers exhausting. Jules, after his “second of readability,” decides to stroll away from violence. His monologue to Pumpkin—full with a pockets labeled “Dangerous Motherf****r”—is badass as typical, but it surely’s additionally a closure.Butch, after a gory chainsaw-style misadventure within the pawn store, finds a manner out from not solely Marsellus’ vengeance however Maynard’s, Zed’s, and The Gimp’s as effectively. His arc wraps up not with glory, however survival and redemption.After which there’s the diner—once more. This time, as an alternative of photographs fired, we get decision. Jules lets the robbers go, sparing them in a manner that mirrors his personal turning level.The construction is quiet, however hermetic. By the point the credit roll, each main arc has been resolved.Tarantino simply makes you’re employed for this decision.Why This Construction Works So WellHere’s the trick: Tarantino retains you guessing with construction, however grounds you with character. By rearranging time, he retains the viewers off-balance, however he by no means lets the arcs drift. Every lead—Jules, Vincent, Butch—goes via an entire transformation. You simply must untangle the timeline to see it.What’s sensible is how Tarantino makes use of construction like a sleight of hand. It’s there, but it surely’s not apparent. And that’s precisely why it really works. You’re pulled in by the cool dialogue, the weird moments, the briefcase glow—however what retains the story satisfying is that deep, invisible structure.The nonlinear strategy, as an alternative of changing the construction, enhances it.Key Takeaways for Writers & Movie LoversWriters like to “break the foundations,” however Pulp Fiction is proof that the true magic occurs when you understand the foundations and twist them simply sufficient. The construction isn’t a cage—it’s scaffolding. You’ll be able to construct one thing wild on high of it, so long as the muse is stable.Wish to play with time? Certain. Combine genres? Go for it. However don’t neglect to offer your characters arcs, your scenes objective, and your story some sort of payoff. Tarantino didn’t throw spaghetti on the wall. He solely made it seem like he did.There’s a purpose Pulp Fiction nonetheless hits thirty years later. And opposite to widespread opinion, it has nothing to do with being cool. It hits the spot even right this moment as a result of it’s calculated. And that’s what makes it value finding out.The Magic of Disguised StructurePulp Fiction couldn’t have deserted the three-act construction—no good story does. It solely hacked it. Tarantino reshuffled the deck however nonetheless dealt the identical important playing cards: setup, confrontation, and backbone. The film feels wild, however lands clear. That’s no accident.So subsequent time you watch it, look previous the Royale with Cheese and glowing briefcases. Beneath the trendy chaos is a blueprint—one which proves nice storytelling doesn’t reject construction.It bends it. It performs with it. And it hides it simply effectively sufficient that we don’t see it till we actually begin trying.