Riley Brennan”The corporate’s information of Vincer’s protected exercise, coupled with a change in its response to Vincer’s problematic conduct mere days after the protected exercise, and the absence of any investigation, evaluation, or documentation in his personnel file to in any other case clarify the termination, constitutes substantial circumstantial proof that the protected exercise was a minimum of a motivating consider Vincer’s termination,” mentioned Decide Theodore A. McKee, who authored the opinion.
Trending
- After PACER hack, judiciary takes ‘special measures’ and ‘technical steps,’ DOJ official says
- Disney Bolsters Adtech and Product Leadership With New Hires
- Today’s Wordle #1523 Hints And Answer For Wednesday, August 20th
- Senate Probe Uncovers Allegations of Widespread Abuse in ICE Custody
- Actors spotted filming in London for new series
- Kirkland Secures First Dismissal of Children’s Privacy Case in EdTech Industry
- Meta is shaking up its AI org, again
- Deel scores a lawsuit win, but not against Rippling