How did one Massachusetts-based firm probably lose $10 million in compensatory damages in a trade-secrets matter? A jury’s interpretation of legal responsibility and differing testimony from damages consultants could possibly be an evidence, in keeping with a Massachusetts federal choose.
Trending
- Trump’s Presidential Jackpot | The New Yorker
- Swarm of jellyfish shuts nuclear power plant in France | France
- Some Thoughts About Portrait Photography Using Natural Light
- Alignment on Rates, Single-Tier Partnership Helped Make Taft the Right Merger Partner for Morris Manning
- American Eagle Ad Controversy Hasn’t Driven Sales, Early Data Suggests
- GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke Quits Job for Entrepreneurship
- The UK wants to measure YouTube more like TV
- Former Intel CEO Barrett says customers should bail out Intel
A $10M Interpretation: Federal Judge Says Jury ‘More Likely’ Awarded $15M in Trade-Secrets Verdict, Not $25M
