Some relationships are usually not outlined by longevity or labels, however by the emotional refuge they provide throughout life’s darkest phases.
When Raj Babbar and Rekha’s paths crossed, each had been navigating private grief — he, mourning the lack of Smita Patil; she, rising from the shadows of a long-standing relationship. Their connection, whereas temporary, was a supply of quiet consolation, cast on a basis of mutual understanding and emotional vulnerability.
Talking years later, Raj Babbar mirrored on that point with outstanding readability. “Sure, our relationship helped me in a means. We drifted collectively due to sure circumstances. At the moment, Rekha had damaged off from a long-standing relationship. She needed to get away from it. I used to be in the same scenario,” he mentioned in an previous interview in response to Occasions of India, explaining how their companionship grew amidst shared sorrow. “On the similar time, we had been additionally working collectively, we clung to one another for emotional assist. We tried to grasp one another’s issues. One doesn’t overlook such a relationship very simply. Although we aren’t collectively at the moment, we nonetheless have fond recollections of these particular moments.”
Story continues beneath this advert
Is it frequent for individuals to bond romantically whereas dealing with grief or emotional loss, and may such relationships present real therapeutic?
Psychologist Raashi Gurnani tells indianexpress.com, “When two individuals discover themselves navigating by way of grief, heartbreak, or emotional transitions, it’s not unusual for a romantic connection to kind. In psychology, that is usually considered as a coping mechanism — individuals instinctively search consolation, understanding, and emotional security in those that replicate their present frame of mind. When Raj Babbar spoke of his bond with Rekha, it appeared to stem from a shared emotional void, a should be understood with out rationalization.”
Movie star Rekha and Raj Babbar in AGAR TUM NA HOTE. (Supply: Specific archive photograph)
In such moments, she notes that vulnerability acts as a bridge, stripping away superficial layers and permitting people to attach on a deeper, extra real degree. “These relationships, although born in fragility, can typically provide real therapeutic. They offer a way of companionship throughout emotionally turbulent occasions, and that mutual presence will be extremely grounding.”
How do emotionally susceptible relationships differ from people who start in additional secure phases of life?
Emotionally susceptible relationships usually carry a distinct weight than these fashioned in emotionally secure durations, notes Gurnani, including that there’s a “heightened depth” in such connections. She mentions, “They have a tendency to evolve rapidly, as a result of each people are craving to really feel entire once more, usually hoping the opposite particular person will fill the emotional void they’re carrying. Whereas this may really feel profound, it could additionally create dependency or blur boundaries. Stability, alternatively, permits for extra conscious, balanced like to develop — the place attraction is commonly primarily based on compatibility relatively than emotional want. Relationships born from trauma might need a lovely starting, however sustaining them long-term requires self-awareness and therapeutic exterior the bond too.”
