This month, indie musicians in San Francisco gathered for a sequence of talks known as Dying to Spotify, the place attenders explored “what it means to decentralize music discovery, manufacturing and listening from capitalist economies”.The occasions, held at Bathers library, featured audio system from indie station KEXP, labels Cherub Dream Data and Dandy Boy Data, and DJ collectives No Bias and Amor Digital. What started as a small run of talks rapidly offered out and drew worldwide curiosity. Folks as far-off as Barcelona and Bengaluru emailed the organizers asking tips on how to host related occasions.A Dying to Spotify occasion at Bathers library in San Francisco, California, on 23 September. {Photograph}: Denise HerediaThe talks come as the worldwide motion in opposition to Spotify edges into the mainstream. In January, music journalist Liz Pelly launched Temper Machine, a important historical past arguing the streaming firm has ruined the business and turned listeners into “passive, uninspired shoppers”. Spotify’s mannequin, she writes, is dependent upon paying artists a pittance – much less nonetheless if they comply with be “playlisted” on its Discovery mode, which rewards the sort of bland, coffee-shop muzak that fades neatly into the background.Artists have lengthy complained about paltry payouts, however this summer time the criticism grew to become private, concentrating on Spotify’s billionaire co-founder Daniel Ek for his funding in Helsing, a German agency growing AI for navy tech. Teams together with Huge Assault, King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard, Deerhoof and Hotline TNT pulled their music from the service in protest. (Spotify has careworn that “Spotify and Helsing are two separate corporations”.)Temper Machine: the Rise of Spotify and the Prices of the Good Playlist by Liz Pelly. {Photograph}: HodderIn Oakland, California, Stephanie Dukich learn Temper Machine, heard concerning the boycotts, and was impressed.Dukich, who investigates complaints in opposition to the town’s police, was a part of a studying group about digital media at Bathers library. Although she is just not a musician, Dukich describes herself, alongside along with her buddy and artwork gallery employee Manasa Karthikeyan, as “actually into sound”.She and Karthikeyan determined to start out related conversations. “Spotify is enmeshed in how we interact with music,” Dukich says. “We thought it might be nice to speak about our relationship to streaming – what it means to truly take our information off and learn to try this collectively.” Dying to Spotify was born.The aim, in brief, was “down with algorithmic listening, down with royalty theft, down with AI-generated music”.Karthikeyan says the duty of quitting Spotify lies as a lot with listeners as artists. “It’s a must to settle for that you just gained’t have instantaneous entry to the whole lot,” she says. “That makes you assume more durable about what you assist.”However will both musicians or listeners even have the nerve to truly boycott the app longterm?A number of well-known musicians have pulled their catalogues from Spotify with massive, headline-grabbing bulletins through the years, solely to quietly come crawling again to the platform after a while. One of many app’s hottest artists, Taylor Swift, boycotted the service for 3 years in protest of its unfair fee practices however returned in 2017. Radiohead’s frontman. Thom Yorke, eliminated some his solo tasks for a similar motive in 2013, calling Spotify “the final determined fart of a dying corpse”; he later put them again.Spotify’s finish sport is for you not to consider what’s playingWill Anderson of Hotline TNTNeil Younger and Joni Mitchell left the app in 2022, citing the corporate’s unique cope with anti-vax podcast host Joe Rogan; each Canadian singer-songwriters contracted polio as youngsters within the Nineteen Fifties. They, too, later restored their catalogues on Spotify.Eric Drott, a professor of music on the College of Texas at Austin, says the brand new wave of boycotts feels totally different. “These acts are much less well-known. For years, artists knew streaming wouldn’t make them wealthy however wanted the visibility. Now there’s a lot music on the market, individuals are questioning whether or not it’s doing a lot for them.”Will Anderson, frontman of Hotline TNT, says there’s “a 0% probability” his band will return. “It doesn’t make sense for true music lovers to be on there,” he says. “Spotify’s finish sport is for you not to consider what’s enjoying.” When the band offered their new document Raspberry Moon immediately by way of Bandcamp and a 24-hour Twitch stream, they offered tons of of copies and “generated hundreds of {dollars}”.Manasa Karthikeyan (left) and Stephanie Dukich. {Photograph}: Eva TuffOthers similar to pop-rock songwriter Caroline Rose are experimenting too. Her album Yr of the Slug got here out solely on vinyl and Bandcamp, impressed by Cindy Lee’s Diamond Jubilee, which was initially obtainable solely on YouTube and the filesharing website Mega. “I discover it fairly lame that we put our coronary heart and soul into one thing after which simply put it on-line without cost,” Rose says.Rose is a member of the Union of Musicians and Allied Staff (UMAW), an advocacy group fashioned at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic to guard music staff. Joey DeFrancesco, a member of the punk rock band Downtown Boys and co-founder of UMAW, says the group “unequivocally helps artists taking company, holding companies accountable, and making splashes [such as taking music off Spotify] to push again on the firm”. On the identical time, DeFrancesco says, that sort of individualized boycotting has its “limits”.“What we attempt to do within the labor motion and at UMAW is to behave collectively,” he provides. Examples embrace UMAW’s profitable marketing campaign (alongside the Austin for Palestine Coalition) to stress the music pageant South by Southwest to drop the US military and weapons producers as sponsors for the 2025 occasion, and the Dwelling Wages for Musicians Act, sponsored by consultant Rashina Tlaib, a invoice that will regulate Spotify payouts to artists.The Dying to Spotify organizers say their aim is just not essentially to close the app down. “We simply need everybody to assume a bit bit more durable concerning the methods they take heed to music,” Karthikeyan says. “It simply flattens tradition at its core if we solely stick with this algorithmically constructed consolation zone.”
Trending
- 5 (In)famous Camera Recalls That Changed Industry Standards Forever
- What is the new EU border system EES, and how will it work? | European Union
- I was skeptical about the redesigned Evercade EXP-R, until I finally tried it
- A tangled web of deals stokes AI bubble fears in Silicon Valley
- Horoscope Today, October 13, 2025: Stamina may feel slightly off, so avoid juggling tasks
- 36 Predictions for Social Media Marketing in 2026
- ‘Morning people are more productive than night people,’ say Akshay Kumar-Twinkle Khanna while Saif Ali Khan-Kajol ‘heartily disagree’ | Health News
- Business school case study: banking on the unbanked