How did one Massachusetts-based firm probably lose $10 million in compensatory damages in a trade-secrets matter? A jury’s interpretation of legal responsibility and differing testimony from damages consultants could possibly be an evidence, in keeping with a Massachusetts federal choose.
Trending
- Immigration crackdown causing ‘Trump slump’ in Las Vegas tourism, unions say | Las Vegas
- AI summaries can downplay medical issues for female patients, UK research finds
- ‘Once again, the west turns away’: a new book recounts the fall and rise of the Taliban | Books
- Are Streaming Movies Boring? Josh Brolin Thinks So
- Murdered man Stephen Brannigan was ‘much loved’
- Meta Enhances Brand Rights Protection Dashboard With Improved UI and Features
- Apple’s new Siri may allow users to operate apps just using voice
- AOL ends dial-up internet service after more than 30 years
A $10M Interpretation: Federal Judge Says Jury ‘More Likely’ Awarded $15M in Trade-Secrets Verdict, Not $25M
