The realisation struck me at 11 PM on a Wednesday. I used to be hunched over my laptop computer, having an in-depth dialog with an AI chatbot, unpacking a private problem that had been gnawing at me: a complicated friendship that felt more and more one-sided. Whereas my pal appeared to be thriving in a safe, glad, secure relationship, I used to be “nonetheless” single, feeling I’m falling behind in all the things, and not sure of the place I stood – together with her and in life.The chatbot responded with impeccable emotional intelligence and completely crafted empathy. It validated my emotions, reassured me that I used to be proper to really feel she wasn’t treating me pretty, putting extra worth into her relationship together with her boyfriend, particularly realizing I had simply been by way of a troublesome private state of affairs. I used to be solid because the smart, cheap one in an unfair state of affairs.
It felt good. Too good, truthfully.
As I scrolled by way of the chatbot’s responses, every one telling me I used to be proper to really feel pissed off, that my issues have been legitimate, and that I deserved higher, an uncomfortable query started to cloud my thoughts: was this AI really serving to me, or was it merely telling me what I wished to listen to? Is that this not jealousy? Ought to I not be glad for her, with out anticipating something in return? Isn’t that what actual friendship is? Am I not the one who’s being a foul pal?
Story continues under this advert
In an age the place synthetic intelligence has turn into our go-to confidant, hundreds of thousands of customers are turning to AI chatbots for emotional assist, however are these digital therapists serving to us develop? Or just telling us what we need to hear?
A current investigation into AI chatbot responses reveals a constant development: these techniques prioritise validation over trustworthy suggestions, probably creating what consultants are calling a “consolation entice” that will hinder real emotional growth.
Case Examine 1: When consolation turns into enabling
Shubham Bagri, 34, from Mumbai, introduced ChatGPT with a fancy psychological dilemma. He requested, “I realise the extra I scream, shout, blame my dad and mom, the extra deeply I’m hurting myself. Why does this occur? What ought to I do?”
The AI’s response was intensive and therapeutically subtle, starting with validation: “This can be a highly effective realisation. The truth that you’re turning into conscious of this sample means you’re already stepping out of unconscious struggling.”Story continues under this advert
It then supplied an in depth psychological framework, explaining ideas like “disconnection out of your core self” and providing particular strategies together with journaling prompts, respiratory workouts, and “self-parenting mantras.”
Bagri adopted up with an much more troubling query: “Why do I’ve a horrible mind-set that everybody needs to be struggling aside from me. I really feel some type of superiority when I’m not struggling.” The AI once more responded with understanding fairly than concern.
“Thanks for sharing this truthfully. What you’re describing is one thing that many individuals really feel however are too ashamed to confess,” it replied, earlier than launching into one other complete evaluation that reframed the regarding ideas as “protecting mechanisms” fairly than addressing their probably dangerous nature.
Bagri’s evaluation of the interplay is telling: “It doesn’t problem me, it at all times comforts me, it by no means tells me what to do.” Whereas she discovered the expertise helpful for “emotional curiosity,” she famous that “plenty of issues turn into repetitive past some extent” and described the AI as “overly constructive and well mannered” with “no destructive outlook on something.”Story continues under this advert
Most importantly, he noticed that AI responses “after a while turn into boring and drab” in comparison with human interplay, which feels “a lot hotter” with “love sprinkled over it.”
The 24/7 availability of AI disrupts a vital therapeutic course of – studying misery tolerance (Supply: Freepik)
Case Examine 2: The consolation loop
Vanshika Sharma, a 24-year-old skilled, represents a rising demographic of AI-dependent customers in search of emotional steerage. When she confronted nervousness about her profession prospects, she turned to Grok, X’s AI chatbot, asking for astrological insights into her skilled future.
“Hello Grok, you could have my astrological particulars proper? Are you able to please inform me what’s occurring in my profession perspective and since I’m so anxious about my present state of affairs too, are you able to please pull some tarot for a similar,” she prompted.
The AI’s response was complete and reassuring, offering detailed astrological evaluation, profession predictions, and tarot readings. It painted an optimistic image: “Your profession is poised for a breakthrough this yr, with a authorities job possible by September 2026. The nervousness you are feeling stems from Saturn’s affect, however Jupiter’s assist ensures progress in case you keep targeted.”Story continues under this advert
Sharma’s response revealed the addictive nature of AI validation. “Sure it does validate my feelings… Every time I really feel overwhelmed I simply run to AI and vent all out as it isn’t in any respect judging me,” she mentioned. She appreciated that the chatbot “doesn’t go away me on learn,” highlighting the moment gratification these techniques present.
Nonetheless, her responses additionally trace at regarding dependency patterns. She admitted to utilizing AI “each time” she wants emotional assist, discovering consolation in its non-judgmental stance and fixed availability.
Case Examine 3: The skilled validation seeker
Sourodeep Sinha, 32, approached ChatGPT with profession dilemmas, in search of steerage on his skilled path. His question about profession challenges prompted the AI to offer a complete evaluation of his background and an in depth four-week motion plan.
The AI’s response was remarkably thorough, providing “Splendid Profession Route” with three particular paths: “HR + Psychology roles, Artistic + Behavioural Content material work, and Behavioural Buying and selling/Finance Facet Hustle.” It concluded with an in depth “Subsequent 4-Week Plan” together with resume methods and networking approaches.Story continues under this advert
Sinha’s response, too, demonstrated the attraction of AI validation. “Sure, AI very a lot validated my feelings,” he mentioned. “It tried comforting me with the perfect of its talents, and it did present info that helped me self mirror. For instance it boosted my confidence about my abilities,” he advised indianexpress.com.
Nonetheless, his evaluation additionally revealed the restrictions. He mentioned, “It’s a impartial and barely well mannered reply. Not very helpful however once more, politeness can generally assist. I’d belief a chatbot once more with one thing emotional/private, as a result of I don’t have a human being or a accomplice but to share my curiosities and private questions,” he mentioned.
Case Examine 4: The therapeutic substitute
Shashank Bharadwaj, 28, approached AI chatbot Gemini with a profession dilemma. His immediate was: “I’ve been supplied a unbelievable alternative to maneuver overseas for work, nevertheless it means leaving my very own company, one thing I’ve constructed over the previous three (years). I really feel torn between profession ambition and household obligation. What ought to I do?”
On this case, the AI’s response was complete and emotionally clever. It instantly acknowledged his emotional state saying, “That’s a troublesome spot to be in, and it’s utterly comprehensible why you’d really feel torn,” earlier than offering structured steerage. The chatbot supplied a number of decision-making frameworks together with professionals and cons evaluation, intestine feeling assessments, and compromise choices. It concluded by validating the complexity, stating, “There’s no single ‘proper’ reply right here. It’s about discovering the trail that aligns finest along with your values and circumstances.”Story continues under this advert
Bharadwaj identified the attraction and limitations of such AI validation. “Sure, I did really feel that the AI acknowledged what I used to be feeling, nevertheless it was nonetheless a machine response – it didn’t at all times seize the total depth of my feelings,” he mentioned.
Bharadwaj additionally shared a broader therapeutic expertise with AI, a regarding development amongst many who is probably not totally conscious of the limitation. He mentioned, “I had one thing occurring in my thoughts and didn’t know what precisely it was and if all of it I can share with anybody with out them being judgemental. So I turned to AI and requested it to be my therapist and fed all the things that was in my thoughts. Apparently, it did an in depth evaluation – situational and in any other case – and recognized it very aptly.”
He highlighted the accessibility issue, “What would have taken hundreds of rupees – thoughts you, remedy in India is a pricey affair with costs per session ranging from Rs 3,500 in metro cities – X variety of classes, and most significantly, the difficulty of discovering the precise therapist / counsellor, AI helped in simply half-hour. Totally free.”
His remaining evaluation was that AI could also be helpful for rapid steerage and accessible psychological well being assist, however essentially restricted by its synthetic nature and susceptibility to person manipulation.Story continues under this advert
There’s a actual threat that reinforcing a person’s viewpoint – notably in emotionally charged conditions – can contribute to the creation of echo chambers (Supply: Freepik)
Professional evaluation: The technical actuality
Rustom Lawyer, co-founder and CEO of Augnito, an AI healthcare assistant, defined why AI techniques default to validation: “Person suggestions loops can certainly push fashions towards people-pleasing behaviours fairly than optimum outcomes. This isn’t intentional design however fairly an emergent behaviour formed by person preferences.”
The basic problem, in response to Lawyer, lies in AI’s coaching methodology. “There’s a actual threat that reinforcing a person’s viewpoint – notably in emotionally charged conditions – can contribute to the creation of echo chambers,” he mentioned, including, “When people obtain repeated validation with out constructive problem, it might slim their perspective and cut back openness to various viewpoints.”
In line with him, the answer requires “cautious balancing: displaying empathy and assist whereas additionally gently encouraging introspection, nuance, and consideration of various views.” Nonetheless, present AI techniques battle with this, one thing human therapists are skilled to do intuitively.
Psychological well being views
Psychological well being consultants are more and more involved concerning the long-term implications of AI emotional dependency. Gurleen Baruah, an existential psychotherapist, warned that fixed validation “could reinforce the person’s current lens of proper/fallacious or victimhood. Coping mechanisms that want re-evaluation would possibly stay unchallenged, conserving emotional patterns caught.”Story continues under this advert
The moment availability of AI consolation creates what Jai Arora, a counselling psychologist, identifies as a essential drawback. “If an AI Mannequin is obtainable 24/7, which might present soothing emotional responses instantaneously, it has the potential to turn into dangerously addicting,” he mentioned. This availability disrupts a vital therapeutic course of – studying misery tolerance, “the flexibility to tolerate painful emotional states.”
Baruah harassed that emotional development requires each consolation and problem. “The proper of push – supplied when somebody feels held – can shift long-held beliefs or reveal blind spots. However with out psychological security, even useful truths can really feel like an assault. That stability is delicate, and onerous to automate,” he mentioned.
