Digicam inside RAW recording for video — is it simply hype, or one thing you’ve embraced and included into your workflow? That is the query we’re asking in at present’s CineD ballot.The controversy in regards to the significance of inside RAW recording for filmmakers has began to take an attention-grabbing form, particularly after Blackmagic Design launched this feature with their Pocket Cinema Digicam (2013, cinemaDNG format). To the very best of our information, it was one of many first video devoted mirrorless cameras to supply this function, which, till then, was solely accessible in higher-end gadgets or when utilizing exterior recorders by way of HDMI. Since then, alongside Blackmagic Design, firms like Panasonic, SIGMA, Canon, Nikon, and RED, in fact, have acknowledged the significance of giving unbiased filmmakers most flexibility when selecting inside recording codecs, additionally in cost-effective digital camera our bodies.Now, for some, inside RAW video recording would possibly really feel like “overkill,” whereas for others it may be a manufacturing “life saver.” Talking of which, the place do you end up on this subject?For me, particularly after working with latest cameras just like the Canon EOS C50 and Nikon ZR, I’m now fully satisfied that inside RAW video recording must be supplied by each digital camera producer. Right here’s why: with out getting “too technical,” take into consideration inside RAW recording as a “security web.” Certainly, all of us attempt to expose our video correctly and set the proper white steadiness, however as an unbiased filmmaker who additionally edits his personal materials, inside RAW recording permits a lot better flexibility in manipulating or treating the footage to realize satisfying outcomes with out sacrificing picture high quality.In different phrases, the significance of inside RAW video recording is larger in “lower-end” productions—the place one would possibly discover themselves doing all of it (or working with a restricted crew)—than in higher-end productions, the place devoted personnel may be assigned to particular duties like colour grading in giant post-production homes.And sure, I’m absolutely conscious that the draw back of utilizing inside RAW codecs when filming is elevated card capability necessities (and at occasions beefed-up computer systems), however I wish to imagine that the funding and further expense are definitely worth the consequence of utilizing such codecs to your workflow. So, what about you? Do you suppose inside RAW recording is simply hype and a advertising device, or a genuinely helpful function when capturing your productions? Please take a second to take part in our ballot, and when you have time, go away a remark too!This ballot makes use of JavaScript. If you happen to can not see the ballot above, please disable “Enhanced/Strict Monitoring Safety” in your browser settings.
Subscribe to Updates
Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.
Trending
- JP Morgan boss says more ‘cockroaches’ will emerge after private credit sector failures | JP Morgan
- Multigrain flours to boost fibre for better nutrition and digestion: 8 picks
- Banks caution over bubble as they report bumper profits
- I love that Bambu Lab has kept costs fair with the latest P2S printer
- Top 10 Influencer Marketing Tools for Effective Campaigns in 2026
- Argentina’s President Milei divided his nation but won over Trump
- Hollyland Pyro 7 & 5 Wireless Transceiver Monitor Kit
- How video games are shaping a generation of boys, for better and worse | Lifestyle News
Camera Internal RAW Recording for Video – Hype or Important for Your Workflow?
Related Posts
Add A Comment