Canon’s RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM lens guarantees to revolutionize telephoto images with its unprecedented zoom vary at a continuing f/2.8 aperture. You are a lens that might doubtlessly substitute a number of prime lenses in your package, however the $9,500 price ticket calls for critical consideration.
Coming to you from Duade Paton, this complete video places the Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM lens by means of intensive real-world testing over a number of days and greater than 10,000 photos. Paton makes it clear from the beginning that this is not actually a wildlife lens regardless of his testing focus. It is engineered for sports activities images the place that fixed f/2.8 aperture shines in low-light situations. The lens weighs a considerable 5.7 kilos, and once you add a digital camera physique just like the EOS R3, you are practically 9 kilos of handheld capturing weight. That is twice the load of Canon’s 100-500mm lens, which raises instant questions on practicality for prolonged capturing classes.
The video reveals some spectacular options that set this lens aside from its predecessors. Paton highlights the preset/recall focus operate as a boon for photographers who ceaselessly lose focus to backgrounds. It can save you a particular focus distance and immediately return to it with the press of a button. The autofocus efficiency is described as “blazingly quick” with twin Nano USM motors, and Paton managed a burst of 146 sharp photos in succession. Nonetheless, the lens turns into considerably extra problematic once you begin utilizing teleconverters, notably the 2x converter that extends the vary to 200-600mm.
Key Specs
Focal Size: 100-300mm
Most Aperture: f/2.8
Minimal Aperture: f/22
Lens Mount: Canon RF
Minimal Focus Distance: 5.9 toes / 1.8 meters
Magnification: 0.06x to 0.16x
Optical Design: 23 parts in 18 teams
Picture Stabilization: Sure
Filter Measurement: 112mm
Weight: 5.7 kilos / 2,590 grams
Dimensions: 5 x 12.7 inches
Paton’s testing reveals that whereas the lens performs exceptionally at its native focal lengths, the 2x teleconverter considerably compromises picture high quality when shot broad open at f/5.6. He discovered significantly better outcomes stopping right down to f/7.1 or f/8, however that defeats a part of the aim of getting such an costly, heavy lens. His comparability with the Sony 200-600mm reveals the Sony delivering sharper outcomes at 600mm, regardless of costing roughly one-fifth the worth. For wildlife photographers particularly, Paton concludes he’d select Canon’s 100-500mm lens as an alternative attributable to its lighter weight, decrease value, and sharp efficiency at f/7.1. Try the video above for the complete rundown from Paton.
