Cracker Barrel CMO Defends Rebrand As Shares Fall 7%

On Tuesday (Aug. 19), Cracker Barrel unveiled a brand new emblem, a lot to the chagrin of the web.Since its launch, left and right-wing politicians, entrepreneurs, and shoppers alike have criticized the change, with some declaring it’s too “woke” and steers away from “American custom.” Others have knocked the simplicity of the design. “WTF is incorrect with @CrackerBarrel??!,” Donald Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son, posted to X. The official X account for the Democratic Social gathering echoed the assertion, posting, “We predict the Cracker Barrel rebrand sucks too.”Following the backlash, the model’s shares fell 7.2% on Thursday morning (Aug. 21), erasing $100 million in market worth. Its shares rose barely on Friday (Aug. 22) in pre-market buying and selling.Nonetheless, Cracker Barrel is doubling down on its new look. In an announcement shared with ADWEEK, Sarah Moore, the model’s chief advertising and marketing officer (CMO), stated its “values haven’t modified, and the center and soul of Cracker Barrel haven’t modified.”“Cracker Barrel has been a vacation spot for consolation and group for greater than half a century, and this fifth evolution of the model’s emblem, which works throughout digital platforms in addition to billboards and roadside indicators, is a call-back to the unique and rooted much more within the iconic barrel form and phrase mark that began all of it again in 1969,” she stated.Cracker Barrel‘All of the Extra‘Cracker Barrel launched the up to date visible id as a part of its new “All of the Extra” marketing campaign, which additionally features a 15-second spot starring nation singer Jordan Davis, new menu objects, and an inside design revamp of its eating places. The emblem eliminated its longstanding previous man and the barrel motif, changing the picture with a easy wordmark within the model’s signature gold and brown.Together with shoppers, the advert trade is split on the rebrand, too. Bruno Regalo, chief design officer at TBWAWorldwide, noticed that whereas “the trouble to modernize the model by simplifying its id and making it extra legible and adaptable to a digital ecosystem” works, it dangers “alienating loyal audiences.”“Heritage manufacturers should keep in mind their id isn’t just aesthetic, it’s cultural,” he advised ADWEEK. “When updating visible codes, they’re not merely adjusting pixels or kind curves, however symbols embedded in individuals’s on a regular basis lives.”He continued: “Greater than following design tendencies, it’s about holding that soul alive—the distinctive parts that contact shoppers emotionally—and reinterpreting them to really feel present and related with out dropping what makes them distinctive.”Kevin Inexperienced, government artistic director (ECD) at Moroch Company, stated the model was the most recent in a run to have stripped its model of “any distinctive or ownable character,” whereas plumping for a extra fashionable aesthetic. “There must be a greater stability between modernity and the magic that has constructed manufacturers like Cracker Barrel for many years,” he stated. Certainly, different advertisers, together with vogue label Burberry, have been critiqued for leaping on this so-called “blanding” pattern, the place a typeface replaces a picture. A Run of Controversial Model MomentsWhile the transfer was supposed to have fun its 55+ 12 months heritage, Cracker Barrel has confronted earlier boycotts over claims of discrimination on account of its American South aesthetic and company insurance policies. It now joins a working record of manufacturers which have stoked controversy and turn out to be a flashpoint within the U.S. tradition wars during the last month, together with American Eagle, Dunkin’, and e.l.f. Cosmetics.