Editor Matt Thiesen on Infusing ’90s Nostalgia into ‘Counting Crows: Have You Seen Me Lately’

At its core, the three-act construction is screenwriting’s previous devoted: Act One units the stage, Act Two raises the stakes, and Act Three pays all of it off. Even the wildest, most “rule-breaking” tales normally grasp on to this framework.The genius of Pulp Fiction is that it doesn’t reject this mannequin—it hides it inside a puzzle of non-linear vignettes. And when you begin trying intently, the items click on collectively, revealing an entire image that’s been there all alongside.So, let’s pull this puzzle aside piece by piece. As a result of when you see the way it matches, Pulp Fiction stops feeling chaotic—and begins displaying itself as a meticulously assembled narrative with three deliberate acts.The Three-Act Construction: A Fast RefresherHere’s the quick-and-dirty on the three-act construction: Act One is the setup. You meet your characters, get a really feel for the world, and hit a turning level that kicks all the things into movement.Act Two is the confrontation—the place stakes rise, plans go sideways, and your protagonists are examined. There’s usually a “midpoint” twist that flips issues round.Act Three is the decision. Whether or not it ends in victory, defeat, or one thing murky in between, the story finds closure.Why does this mannequin nonetheless matter in 2025?As a result of it really works. You possibly can bend it, scramble it, even mild it on fireplace, however the human mind nonetheless loves tales with a starting, center, and finish—even when we’re not seeing them in that order. Most filmmakers (sure, even the bizarre ones) quietly use this construction as a basis.And Tarantino? Nicely, he additionally makes use of it—it’s simply he hides it in plain sight.Pulp Fiction’s Narrative TrickeryLet’s get one factor clear: non-linear storytelling doesn’t imply no-structure storytelling. Pulp Fiction might appear like a group of out-of-order quick movies, however when you line all the things up chronologically, the basic construction jumps proper out.Tarantino provides us vignettes—Vincent Vega’s misadventures, Butch’s escape, Jules’ disaster of religion—however these aren’t aimless. They’re intentionally crafted to serve bigger arcs. Vincent’s evening out with Mia, is greater than only a quirky filler—it builds rigidity, units up penalties, and results in a climax (hi there, overdose scene). It’s possible you’ll assume these items are simply floating and hovering. In reality, they’re connecting.And what’s wild is, although the timeline jumps round, the emotional beats are positioned precisely the place they might be in a standard three-act movie. You simply should zoom out to see it.Act 1: Hidden Setup—The Calm Earlier than the StormTarantino’s opening scenes might really feel free, however they’re quietly laying the inspiration. We begin with “Vincent & Jules’ Divine Intervention”—the banter, Massive Kahuna Burger, the Ezekiel 25:17, the capturing. All this goes past taste and units up character dynamics, the mysterious briefcase, and Jules’ inside battle, which turns into central later.Then we leap to Butch (Bruce Willis), the washed-up boxer, being paid by Marsellus Wallace (Ving Rhames) to throw a combat. That scene? It’s pure setup. You meet Butch’s quiet resistance, Marsellus’ looming presence, and a battle ready to blow up.These early items don’t scream “Act One,” however they do precisely what an Act One ought to: introduce the gamers, the stakes, and the strain cooker they’re all sitting in.Tarantino’s simply swapping out conventional exposition for hitman small discuss and breakfast violence. ‘Pulp Fiction’ Credit score: Miramax Movies Act 2: Confrontation—The Internet TightensNow the strain builds. Pulp Fiction’s Act Two is chaos in a swimsuit—and but, all the things escalates with precision.The midpoint shift is sly. It’s not a gunfight or an enormous reveal—it’s the diner. “Pumpkin” (Tim Roth) and “Honey Bunny” (Amanda Plummer) attempt to rob the place. It’s the identical scene we noticed firstly—however now, we return to it with new context. Jules (Samuel L. Jackson) is mid-philosophical awakening, and immediately, this low-stakes theft turns into a high-stakes ethical take a look at.Elsewhere, Vincent (John Travolta) offers with Mia’s (Uma Thurman) overdose. Butch kills a man within the ring, betrays Marsellus, and goes on the run. Each character is colliding with penalties. Each thread tightens.The pacing would possibly really feel informal, however don’t be fooled. That is basic Act Two materials—rising rigidity, converging storylines, and characters pushed to their limits.Act 3: Decision—The Hidden PayoffsYou won’t spot it instantly, however Pulp Fiction’s third act delivers arduous. Jules, after his “second of readability,” decides to stroll away from violence. His monologue to Pumpkin—full with a pockets labeled “Dangerous Motherf****r”—is badass as common, nevertheless it’s additionally a closure.Butch, after a gory chainsaw-style misadventure within the pawn store, finds a method out from not solely Marsellus’ vengeance however Maynard’s, Zed’s, and The Gimp’s as nicely. His arc wraps up not with glory, however survival and redemption.After which there’s the diner—once more. This time, as a substitute of pictures fired, we get decision. Jules lets the robbers go, sparing them in a method that mirrors his personal turning level.The construction is quiet, however hermetic. By the point the credit roll, each main arc has been resolved.Tarantino simply makes you’re employed for this decision.Why This Construction Works So WellHere’s the trick: Tarantino retains you guessing with construction, however grounds you with character. By rearranging time, he retains the viewers off-balance, however he by no means lets the arcs drift. Every lead—Jules, Vincent, Butch—goes by an entire transformation. You simply should untangle the timeline to see it.What’s sensible is how Tarantino makes use of construction like a sleight of hand. It’s there, nevertheless it’s not apparent. And that’s precisely why it really works. You’re pulled in by the cool dialogue, the weird moments, the briefcase glow—however what retains the story satisfying is that deep, invisible structure.The nonlinear method, as a substitute of changing the construction, enhances it.Key Takeaways for Writers & Movie LoversWriters like to “break the foundations,” however Pulp Fiction is proof that the true magic occurs when you recognize the foundations and twist them simply sufficient. The construction isn’t a cage—it’s scaffolding. You possibly can construct one thing wild on high of it, so long as the inspiration is stable.Need to play with time? Certain. Combine genres? Go for it. However don’t overlook to present your characters arcs, your scenes function, and your story some sort of payoff. Tarantino didn’t throw spaghetti on the wall. He solely made it appear like he did.There’s a purpose Pulp Fiction nonetheless hits thirty years later. And opposite to fashionable opinion, it has nothing to do with being cool. It hits the spot even right now as a result of it’s calculated. And that’s what makes it value finding out.The Magic of Disguised StructurePulp Fiction couldn’t have deserted the three-act construction—no good story does. It solely hacked it. Tarantino reshuffled the deck however nonetheless dealt the identical important playing cards: setup, confrontation, and backbone. The film feels wild, however lands clear. That’s no accident.So subsequent time you watch it, look previous the Royale with Cheese and glowing briefcases. Beneath the fashionable chaos is a blueprint—one which proves nice storytelling doesn’t reject construction.It bends it. It performs with it. And it hides it simply nicely sufficient that we don’t see it till we actually begin trying.