Dwelling
Every day Information
Federal appeals choose, 98, plans to ‘proceed…
Judiciary
Federal appeals choose, 98, plans to ‘proceed the battle’ after panel recommends continued suspension
By Debra Cassens Weiss
July 29, 2025, 11:38 am CDT
Choose Pauline Newman, now age 98, of the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Could 2023. In keeping with a three-judge particular committee, Newman’s eloquent talking means and her docs’ reviews don’t justify her refusal to undergo neuropsychological assessments. (Picture by Invoice O’Leary/The Washington Submit by way of Getty Pictures)
A federal appeals choose’s eloquent talking means and her docs’ reviews don’t justify her refusal to undergo neuropsychological assessments, in keeping with a three-judge particular committee of the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Federal Circuit Choose Pauline Newman, 98, ought to obtain a 3rd one-year suspension from listening to new instances, in keeping with the particular panel’s July 28 report and advice, which was famous by How Interesting.
Law360, Bloomberg Legislation and Reuters have protection. Extra supplies can be found right here.
Newman, who’s interesting dismissal of her lawsuit difficult the suspension, advised Reuters that she plans to “proceed the battle.”
“I’m involved lest these travesties of process and regulation purchase precedential power, inserting a cloud on any choose of divergent coverage or politics or perhaps a choose who writes dissents,” she advised Reuters.
Newman was first suspended from listening to new instances in September 2023 for refusing to take part in medical evaluations to find out her psychological health for the bench. The Federal Circuit’s judicial council on the time cited “overwhelming proof that Choose Newman could also be experiencing vital psychological issues, together with reminiscence loss, lack of comprehension, confusion and an lack of ability to carry out fundamental duties.”
Within the new report, the panel famous that certainly one of Newman’s docs, Dr. Ted Rothstein, testified in a deposition that he had beneficial throughout an examination in July 2023 that she bear a extra detailed neuropsychological battery of assessments for a definitive dedication on health for her duties.
“Years of litigating this dispute may have been averted,” the panel stated, if Newman had heeded that advice.
One other physician for Newman additionally acknowledged that her examination didn’t embody a health for obligation examination.
A 3rd physician who examined Newman stated a CT perfusion scan confirmed no cognitive impairment. However three consultants retained by the panel stated such assessments will not be an accepted diagnostic method within the discipline.
The third physician additionally stated his skilled testimony has by no means been excluded, however that’s not true, the particular panel stated. His skilled testimony has been excluded by a number of courts, together with on grounds that his opinions had been too speculative and conclusory.
The panel additionally stated medical information produced by Newman listed reminiscence impairment on a issues record, with out additional clarification, and that she was hospitalized twice for fainting episodes.
The medical information record Newman’s regulation clerk as some extent of contact, a caregiver and even her “authorized guardian,” the report stated. The clerk arranges and attends medical visits and gives a lot of the medical historical past, even when Newman is current. That clerk relied on the Fifth Modification in response to almost each query at her deposition.
When her regulation clerk was not current, Newman wrongly advised certainly one of her docs that she was not admitted to the hospital 4 months prior for a fainting episode. A yr later, she advised one other physician that she by no means had a fainting episode.
Nor was the panel impressed by movies of interviews given by Newman.
“All of this data suggesting that Choose Newman is ready to communicate eloquently in restricted situations doesn’t overcome the overwhelming proof indicating that additional neuropsychological testing is warranted,” the particular panel stated. “Certainly, such a capability to supply fluid speech and apparently ‘regular’ cognition is to be anticipated, even when there are related cognitive disabilities, in an individual, like Choose Newman, who is extremely educated and had a very excessive cognitive means to start with.”
One in all Newman’s legal professionals, Gregory Dolin of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonprofit public curiosity regulation agency, advised Law360 that the panel delivered its opinion simply days after listening to arguments.
“That is only a mockery of any type of due course of,” Dolin stated.
Write a letter to the editor, share a narrative tip or replace, or report an error.
