On the middle of each empire is an ideology, a perception system that propels the system ahead and justifies enlargement – even when the price of that enlargement immediately defies the ideology’s said mission.
For European colonial powers, it was Christianity and the promise of saving souls whereas extracting assets. For right now’s AI empire, it’s synthetic basic intelligence to “profit all humanity.” And OpenAI is its chief evangelist, spreading zeal throughout the business in a method that has reframed how AI is constructed.
“I used to be interviewing folks whose voices had been shaking from the fervor of their beliefs in AGI,” Karen Hao, journalist and bestselling creator of “Empire of AI,” instructed TechCrunch on a current episode of Fairness.
In her guide, Hao likens the AI business generally, and OpenAI specifically, to an empire.
“The one option to actually perceive the scope and scale of OpenAI’s conduct…is definitely to acknowledge that they’ve already grown extra highly effective than just about any nation state on this planet, they usually’ve consolidated a rare quantity of not simply financial energy, but additionally political energy,” Hao mentioned. “They’re terraforming the Earth. They’re rewiring our geopolitics, all of our lives. And so you possibly can solely describe it as an empire.”
OpenAI has described AGI as “a extremely autonomous system that outperforms people at most economically precious work,” one that can someway “elevate humanity by growing abundance, turbocharging the financial system, and aiding within the discovery of latest scientific information that modifications the boundaries of risk.”
These nebulous guarantees have fueled the business’s exponential development — its large useful resource calls for, oceans of scraped knowledge, strained vitality grids, and willingness to launch untested programs into the world. All in service of a future that many specialists say might by no means arrive.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Hao says this path wasn’t inevitable, and that scaling isn’t the one option to get extra advances in AI.
“You may also develop new strategies in algorithms,” she mentioned. “You may enhance the present algorithms to cut back the quantity of knowledge and compute that they should use.”
However that tactic would have meant sacrificing pace.
“Once you outline the search to construct helpful AGI as one the place the victor takes all — which is what OpenAI did — then crucial factor is pace over the rest,” Hao mentioned. “Pace over effectivity, pace over security, pace over exploratory analysis.”
Picture Credit:Kim Jae-Hwan/SOPA Photos/LightRocket / Getty Photos
For OpenAI, she mentioned, the easiest way to ensure pace was to take current strategies and “simply do the intellectually low-cost factor, which is to pump extra knowledge, extra supercomputers, into these current strategies.”
OpenAI set the stage, and moderately than fall behind, different tech firms determined to fall in line.
“And since the AI business has efficiently captured many of the high AI researchers on this planet, and people researchers now not exist in academia, then you have got a whole self-discipline now being formed by the agenda of those firms, moderately than by actual scientific exploration,” Hao mentioned.
The spend has been, and will likely be, astronomical. Final week, OpenAI mentioned it expects to burn by $115 billion in money by 2029. Meta mentioned in July that it might spend as much as $72 billion on constructing AI infrastructure this yr. Google expects to hit as much as $85 billion in capital expenditures for 2025, most of which will likely be spent on increasing AI and cloud infrastructure.
In the meantime, the objective posts hold shifting, and the loftiest “advantages to humanity” haven’t but materialized, even because the harms mount. Harms like job loss, focus of wealth, and AI chatbots that gasoline delusions and psychosis. In her guide, Hao additionally paperwork employees in creating nations like Kenya and Venezuela who had been uncovered to disturbing content material, together with baby sexual abuse materials, and had been paid very low wages — round $1 to $2 an hour — in roles like content material moderation and knowledge labeling.
Hao mentioned it’s a false tradeoff to pit AI progress towards current harms, particularly when different types of AI supply actual advantages.
She pointed to Google DeepMind’s Nobel Prize-winning AlphaFold, which is skilled on amino acid sequence knowledge and sophisticated protein folding constructions, and might now precisely predict the 3D construction of proteins from their amino acids — profoundly helpful for drug discovery and understanding illness.
“These are the forms of AI programs that we’d like,” Hao mentioned. “AlphaFold doesn’t create psychological well being crises in folks. AlphaFold doesn’t result in colossal environmental harms … as a result of it’s skilled on considerably much less infrastructure. It doesn’t create content material moderation harms as a result of [the datasets don’t have] the entire poisonous crap that you simply hoovered up whenever you had been scraping the web.”
Alongside the quasi-religious dedication to AGI has been a story in regards to the significance of racing to beat China within the AI race, in order that Silicon Valley can have a liberalizing impact on the world.
“Actually, the other has occurred,” Hao mentioned. “The hole has continued to shut between the U.S. and China, and Silicon Valley has had an illiberalizing impact on the world … and the one actor that has come out of it unscathed, you possibly can argue, is Silicon Valley itself.”
After all, many will argue that OpenAI and different AI firms have benefitted humanity by releasing ChatGPT and different giant language fashions, which promise enormous positive aspects in productiveness by automating duties like coding, writing, analysis, buyer assist, and different knowledge-work duties.
However the way in which OpenAI is structured — half non-profit, half for-profit — complicates the way it defines and measures its influence on humanity. And that’s additional difficult by the information this week that OpenAI reached an settlement with Microsoft that brings it nearer to ultimately going public.
Two former OpenAI security researchers instructed TechCrunch that they concern the AI lab has begun to confuse its for-profit and non-profit missions — that as a result of folks take pleasure in utilizing ChatGPT and different merchandise constructed on LLMs, this ticks the field of benefiting humanity.
Hao echoed these issues, describing the risks of being so consumed by the mission that actuality is ignored.
“Even because the proof accumulates that what they’re constructing is definitely harming important quantities of individuals, the mission continues to paper all of that over,” Hao mentioned. “There’s one thing actually harmful and darkish about that, of [being] so wrapped up in a perception system you constructed that you simply lose contact with actuality.”
