In 2018, when Bitcoin was buying and selling round $4,000 and most Individuals, no less than, thought cryptocurrency was a fad, Katie Haun discovered herself on a debate stage in Mexico Metropolis reverse Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist. As Krugman centered on Bitcoin’s wild value swings, Haun steered the dialog towards one thing else — stablecoins.
“Stablecoins are actually fascinating and actually vital to this ecosystem to hedge in opposition to that volatility,” she argued on stage, explaining how digital tokens pegged to the U.S. greenback might provide the advantages of blockchain expertise with out the ups and downs of conventional cryptocurrencies.
Krugman dismissed the concept completely.
It wasn’t precisely a turning level in Haun’s profession, nevertheless it was one second amongst others which have helped outline it. A former federal prosecutor, Haun brings an uncommon background to crypto investing, having spent over a decade investigating monetary crimes and creating the federal government’s first cryptocurrency process drive. After changing into the primary feminine accomplice at Andreessen Horowitz in 2018 and co-leading its crypto funds, she based Haun Ventures in 2022 with over $1.5 billion in belongings below administration.
Hanging her personal shingle hasn’t been with out its complexities. Regardless of her position at a16z and the trade connections that got here with it, the 2 haven’t publicly co-invested in something since shortly after she launched her fund, and Haun stepped down from Coinbase’s board final 12 months whereas Marc Andreessen stays a director.
When requested Wednesday night time at TechCrunch’s StrictlyVC occasion about her relationship with Andreessen Horowitz, she downplayed any potential friction whereas acknowledging they aren’t collaborators precisely. “There’s no ‘gentleman’s settlement,’” she mentioned, echoing this editor’s query about whether or not there’s any understanding to keep away from competing together with her former employer. “The truth is, I nonetheless discuss to Andreessen Horowitz. You’re proper that we haven’t actually completed any offers collectively of late.”
The obvious lack of co-investment might replicate the cutthroat trade or the challenges related to leaving one among Silicon Valley’s most distinguished corporations to compete straight with former colleagues. Regardless of the case, Haun is now charting her personal course, and on the coronary heart of it’s stablecoins, that are cryptocurrencies designed to take care of a secure worth by being pegged to conventional belongings just like the U.S. greenback.
In contrast to Bitcoin or Ethereum, which may swing wildly in worth, stablecoins like Circle’s USDC or Tether’s USDT are supposed to commerce at precisely $1, making a digital illustration of conventional forex that may transfer on blockchain networks.
Certainly, fast-forward to right this moment, and Haun’s perception in stablecoins appears to be like more and more prescient. Stablecoins — which barely existed in 2015 — now symbolize 1 / 4 of a trillion {dollars} in worth. They’ve grow to be the 14th largest holder of U.S. Treasuries globally. Reportedly, for the primary time final 12 months, stablecoin transaction quantity exceeded Visa’s.
“I feel individuals who checked out stablecoins a number of years in the past thought, what’s the worth prop?” Haun mentioned Wednesday night time. “You’ve requested me this earlier than. You mentioned, ‘Why do I would like stablecoins?’ And I mentioned, “I consult with this as an ‘If it really works for me, it really works for everybody’ drawback.”
In actuality, for many Individuals, the present monetary system works fairly nicely. We have now Venmo, financial institution accounts, bank cards. However Haun, drawing on her prosecutor’s understanding of worldwide monetary programs, says she has lengthy been conscious that the U.S. expertise isn’t common.
In international locations with unstable currencies or restricted banking infrastructure, stablecoins provide one thing distinctive, she argues, which is on the spot entry to secure, dollar-denominated worth that may be despatched wherever on this planet for pennies. “Folks in Turkey don’t consider Tether as a cryptocurrency,” she mentioned Wednesday, “They consider Tether as cash.”
The expertise has advanced dramatically since these early debates, definitely. Stablecoins as soon as value $12 to ship internationally. And Circle says its USDC stablecoin is absolutely backed one-to-one by {dollars} held in JP Morgan financial institution accounts and audited by Huge 4 accounting corporations.
Little surprise the company world is taking discover in an enormous manner. Walmart and Amazon are reportedly exploring stablecoins, as are different goliaths like Uber, Apple, and Airbnb. The reason being easy economics. Stablecoins present a technique to transfer the worth of U.S. {dollars} utilizing cryptocurrency rails as an alternative of conventional banking infrastructure, probably saving these retail-heavy corporations billions in processing charges.
However the shift has critics nervous about financial chaos. Whereas Circle and Tether are dedicated to having sufficient reserves to assist their tokens, not like conventional banks, there’s no insured authorities safety behind these reserves. Relatedly, if main companies can problem their very own currencies, what occurs to financial coverage and banking regulation?
The issues run deeper than simply financial disruption. Not all stablecoins are created equal, and lots of lack the backing and oversight that corporations like Circle present. Whereas well-regulated stablecoins like USDC are backed by precise {dollars} in U.S. Treasury securities, others function with much less transparency or depend on advanced algorithmic mechanisms which have confirmed susceptible to break down. (TerraUSD has had probably the most specular crash to this point, wiping out $60 billion in worth when it nosedived.)
Corruption issues particularly got here into sharp focus just lately when President Donald Trump’s household issued its personal stablecoin, a transfer that highlighted potential conflicts of curiosity in an trade the place political affect can straight influence market worth and regulatory outcomes.
These issues got here to a head as Congress debated the GENIUS Act, laws that might create a federal framework for stablecoin regulation. The invoice handed the Senate early final week with bipartisan assist, with 14 Democrats crossing get together strains to assist it. It now awaits a Home vote earlier than probably reaching the president’s desk.
However Senator Elizabeth Warren, the rating member on the Senate Banking Committee, has been significantly vocal in her opposition, calling the laws a “superhighway for Donald Trump’s corruption.” Her criticism facilities on a notable hole within the invoice: whereas it prohibits members of Congress and senior government department officers from issuing stablecoin merchandise, it says nothing about their members of the family.
Requested about Warren’s issues on Wednesday night time, Haun virtually rolled her eyes. “I feel it’s actually ironic that Elizabeth Warren or different Democrats who do name this corruption usually are not working to go crypto laws,” she mentioned. “Had there been guidelines of the highway in place [already], there would have been a framework, there would have been clear guidelines for what’s a safety, what’s a commodity, and what are the patron protections round that.”
Haun, whose enterprise capital agency has made quite a few stablecoin investments together with Bridge (acquired by Stripe for reportedly 10 occasions ahead income), is essentially supportive of the laws, unsurprisingly. However she had one notable criticism when requested what she doesn’t like about it: the invoice’s prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins.
“I’m unsure that yield-bearing stablecoins are a good suggestion for shoppers within the U.S., however I’m unsure {that a} prohibition is a good suggestion,” she advised StrictlyVC attendees. The problem comes right down to who earnings from the curiosity earned on stablecoin reserves. At the moment, that cash goes to corporations like Circle and Coinbase. However Haun wonders why shoppers shouldn’t get that yield, identical to they might with a financial savings account.
“Should you had a financial savings account or checking account and also you’re getting yield on that, you’re getting curiosity,” she defined. “What if you happen to simply mentioned, ‘No, the financial institution will get curiosity, not you,’ and so they’re lending out your cash?”
Haun was much less nuanced in the case of one other Warren concern: that if the GENIUS Act is signed into regulation, stablecoins might grow to be a automobile for cash laundering and terrorism financing.
“Criminals are nice beta testers of all applied sciences,” mentioned Haun. “However this expertise is very traceable, far more traceable than money. The most important prison instrument is the greenback invoice.” (Based on Haun, the Treasury Division has testified that 99.9% of cash laundering crimes succeed utilizing conventional financial institution wires, not cryptocurrency.)
In the meantime, she mentioned, the regulatory readability that laws just like the GENIUS Act supplies might truly make the system safer by distinguishing between legit, well-backed stablecoins from extra experimental or dangerous variants.
The truth is, because the stablecoin ecosystem continues to mature, Haun sees even larger modifications forward. She envisions a future the place all types of belongings — from cash market funds to actual property to personal credit score — get “tokenized” and made obtainable 24/7 to world markets.
“It’s only a digital illustration of a bodily asset,” she explains. “BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, they’ve already tokenized their cash market funds. That’s already occurred.”
Based on Haun, tokenized belongings might democratize entry to investments in methods just like how Netflix democratized leisure. As a substitute of getting to be rich sufficient to fulfill minimal funding thresholds, somebody with $25 and a smartphone might purchase fractional possession in a share of Apple or Amazon, for instance.
“Simply because one thing’s inevitable doesn’t imply it’s imminent,” Haun mentioned on Wednesday. However she’s assured the transformation is coming, pushed by the identical forces that made stablecoins profitable: they’re quicker, cheaper, and, she insists, extra accessible than conventional options.
Wanting again at that 2018 debate with Krugman, Haun’s persistence appears to have paid off. A serious query now isn’t whether or not digital {dollars} will reshape the monetary system however maybe extra importantly, whether or not regulators can hold tempo with the expertise whereas addressing legit issues about corruption, client safety, and monetary stability.
Haun doesn’t appear involved. Whereas critics level to the truth that stablecoins symbolize simply 2% of worldwide funds, questioning their product-market match, Haun bats away that concern, too. As a substitute, she sees this as a well-recognized tech adoption story — one which has performed out repeatedly and sometimes takes longer than folks initially think about.
“We predict it’s actually early days,” she advised the group.
Should you’re curious to be taught extra about what Haun needed to say this previous week, you possibly can try our full dialog beneath:
