Dwelling
Internet First
US nonetheless pursuing ex-BigLaw affiliate after…
Prison Justice
US nonetheless pursuing ex-BigLaw affiliate after grand jury declines to indict in alleged Nationwide Guard confrontation
By Debra Cassens Weiss
September 11, 2025, 9:36 am CDT
Nationwide Guard troops stand guard close to the Metropolitan Detention Heart on June 9 in downtown Los Angeles. (Photograph by Eric Thayer/The Related Press)
Up to date: The federal authorities filed a trimmed felony grievance towards a fired Covington & Burling affiliate Tuesday, the identical day {that a} federal grand jury declined to indict him on three expenses for a confrontation with Nationwide Guard members.
The fired affiliate is Paul Anthony Bryant, a graduate of West Level and Columbia Regulation Faculty. Grand jurors declined to indict him on preliminary federal expenses of assaulting, resisting or impeding officers; impeding a federal official by a risk; and threatening to kidnap or injure an individual, report Newsweek (through Bloomberg Regulation’s Wake Up Name) and WUSA.
The brand new Sept. 9 felony info retains the federal cost of assaulting, resisting or impeding officers and provides a brand new cost of threats to do bodily hurt beneath the District of Columbia code. The opposite two federal expenses have been dropped.
Each of the brand new expenses are misdemeanors and don’t require an indictment, explains Bryant’s lawyer, trial lawyer Alexis Morgan Gardner of the Workplace of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Columbia.
Bryant stays launched on private recognizance. The federal authorities is not interesting a federal Justice of the Peace decide’s choice to launch him.
Bryant approached a bunch of Nationwide Guard members Aug. 24, in accordance with the preliminary federal grievance and different courtroom paperwork. He allegedly made statements to the impact that he was “strapped,” “these are our streets” and “I’ll kill you.” The Nationwide Guard members understood “strapped” to imply that Bryant was armed.
Bryant then approached further Nationwide Guard members and “threw his left shoulder” into the left shoulder of considered one of them, making bodily contact, prosecutors alleged.
When Washington, D.C., cops stopped Bryant, he had a handgun in his rear waistband. It was lawfully bought and carried beneath a sound license.
Bryant’s attorneys mentioned in a courtroom submitting at most, “the allegations quantity to phrases—‘I’ll kill you’—adopted by a shoulder examine.”
“The DOJ’s dealing with of this case is deeply troubling,” Gardner instructed the ABA Journal in a press release. “Paul Bryant, a lawyer and Military lieutenant, spent a number of nights in a notoriously harmful D.C. jail—at the moment beneath authorized scrutiny for its horrific situations—based mostly on expenses a grand jury finally rejected. Whereas the federal government now pursues lesser misdemeanors, the injury is finished. Arrests keep on an individual’s report endlessly. This sort of prosecutorial overreach—jailing somebody with out enough proof for a felony—is not only reckless; it’s an affront to the ideas of due course of and particular person liberty.”
Earlier than he was fired, Bryant used LinkedIn to accuse a Covington & Burling companion of calling him a racial slur. A spokesperson for the regulation agency beforehand denied the accusations, calling them “false and repugnant.”
Up to date Sept. 11 at 10:55 a.m. with feedback from trial lawyer Alexis Morgan Gardner.
Write a letter to the editor, share a narrative tip or replace, or report an error.
